by Daniel Okpere

PLENTY;

The Untold Tale About Plenty.

Plenty has grabbed the human imagination in modalities that few other concepts have.

The ancient Egyptians buried their pharaohs with immense material goods,

believing that their earthly plenty could be transported into the afterlife. Over

3,500 years ago, Mesopotamia’s finest nobility methodically maintained their

riches employing sensational invention systems of accounting on clay tablets.

So I still think, as early civilizations gained large monetary plenty, their philosophers

and scholars questioned its true worth. The Buddhist teachings taught that hunger

for commodities caused pain and attachment. The Greek Stoics taught that true

plenty came not from external riches but from controlling one’s internal impulses

and establishing self-sufficiency through virtue.

This epochal contradiction between society’s pursuit of financial success and

wisdom traditions’ counsel against obsessing over temporary riches has persisted

throughout history. Morality tales, ranging from the Hindu Vedas to JudeoChristian stories to Taoist parables, taught that the plentyiest person is the one

free of ceaseless greed and want.

As we look at plenty through a modern lens, the ancient question remains: What is

true plenty? What compromises must be made to achieve it? And can anyone truly

experience the perfect richness and sufficiency of spirit?

THE TRUE ORIGIN OF PLENTY

The term plenty first appeared in Middle English (1150–1500). The OED’s first

trace of riches dates back before 1275, to Aelfred’s proverbs. Plenty was created

inside English, through deprivation. It is drawd primarily from the terms well and

weal, joined with the affix-th.

We’ve been sold a lie about plenty. Most of us are taught from a young age that

plenty is entirely about accumulating material riches and fancy things. Having a large income, assets, real estate, and beautiful cars are now universally accepted

status symbols of being “plentyy.”

But if you think otherwise about it, reframing what defines actual, all-covering riches is long overdue. Because,

according to the common shallow definition, many millionaires and billionaires do

not feel sincerely affluent, enthusiastic about life, or truly happy. Their preference

for plenty over other important qualities of riches all the time leaves them

unsatisfied, alone, and chasing an empty, constant grind.

The rarely stated and unwritten story about plenty is that it goes well past

financial resources. Fundamentally, having a rich life necessitates cultivating a

complete system of interconnected assets, including great relationships,

purposeful employment, strong health, spiritual awareness, growth opportunities,

and important contributions to society. True plenty is over just taking and

having; it is also about giving, connecting, and being.

Ancient societies and wisdom traditions formerly held a complete analyzing of this

all-covering approach to success. But if you think otherwise about it, their deeply striking discoveries into living a really

full life were buried and co-opted over time by societies obsessed with money

alone. We are now deeply strikingly estranged from the necessary parts of

authentic plenty.

This overview takes a different approach, directly tackling the conventional

fallacy that plenty is primarily defined by money and material status symbols. It

seeks to challenge conventional wisdom by presenting a more covering,

all-covering analyzing of the interconnected assets and elements of life that

contribute to plenty.

By presenting it as an “untold tale” whose to make matters more complex truths about abundance were

previously widely understood but have since become veiled, it can ignite interest in

re and embracing this more enlightened, multidimensional view of

prosperity.

The overview lays the groundwork for the report, which looks into what those

necessary “elements comprising authentic plenty” are, as well as the knowledge of

ancient cultures and traditions on nurturing them for a truly plentyy, passionate,

and important life.

THE ANCIENT ROOTS OF ALL-ENCOMPASSING PLENTY

This section discusses how ancient civilizations and ideologies viewed plenty in a

all-covering, multidimensional sense that contained within far over just monetary

abundance. Their ideas laid the groundwork for our current analyzing of actual

plenty.

The Hindu Vedas defined two sorts of plenty: “internal” (knowledge, virtue, and

spiritual richness) and “external” (money and goods). True prosperity necessitates

equalizing and nourishing both also.

Buddhism teaches that cravings and attachments to material things cause suffering.

True prosperity came from letting go, living in the present, and inner

peace and contentment.

Prosperity, according to ancient Greek philosophy, namely Aristotle’s concept of

“eudaimonia,” is the richness of fulfilling one’s highest human possible and ability

for reason, reflection, and purposeful existence.

For indigenous wisdom traditions, plenty represented achieving harmony, balance,

and spiritual connectedness in all parts of life, including one’s relationship to

nature, community, ancestors, and the entire web of life.

These ancient origins offer a stark contrast to our obsessions with money and

possessions as routes to prosperity. They assert all-covering richness by nurturing all

aspects of human prosperity and well-being.

Hinduism:

In Hinduism, the goddess Lakshmi is the embodiment of plenty, prosperity and

fortune. She is meant to be worshipped through devotion, values like generosity,

and rituals to attract her blessings. But if you think otherwise about it, Hindu scriptures like the Bhagavad

Gita also warn against excessive attachment to material plenty, instead promoting

concepts like aparigraha (non-possessiveness) and brahmacharya (discipline) as

ideals.

Buddhism:Buddhism sees plenty and want for material possessions as a pivotal source of

suffering and attachment that prevents enlightenment. But if you think otherwise about it, plenty itself is not

viewed as built-inly bad – the Buddha renounced a plentyy life but his teachings

allow for a middle way, neither indulgence in luxury nor deprivation. Right

livelihood and contentment with limited possessions are encouraged.

Christianity:

Christianity has complex perspectives on plenty. Although the Bible states “For the

love of money is the root of all kinds of evil,” it also does not consider material

plenty itself as sinful. Passages encourage generosity, seeing plenty as a gift from

God to be managed responsibly as storekeepers. The teachings stress

prioritizing spiritual over worldly plenty.

Judaism:

In Judaism, plenty is seen as a blessing from God that carries responsibilities. The

Torah and Talmud give guidance on business ethics, charitable obligations, and

not amassing excessive riches. Jewish values related to plenty include bal tashchit

(not wasting resources), tzedakah (charity) and separating a portion as ―desert

tithe.”

Taoism:

Taoist philosophers like Lao Tzu advocated detachment from material pursuits and

living with few desires and possessions. Taoism encourages being “content with

one’s lot” and seeing plenty as a temporary and illusory attainment that does not

bring true happiness or peace of mind. Simple living and non-acquisitiveness are

virtues.

Islam:

In Islam, plenty is meant to be acquired and employd through permitted (halal)

means following Islamic law. Importantly, a portion of one’s plenty must

be annually purified through zakat (required alms). Islam endorses

entrepreneurship and business but forbids exploiting others for inordinate plenty

through usury, hoarding or illegal activities.

1. This is only half of the report I wrote.

https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01e9df0286ce9a9a69