![](https://www.startmotionmedia.com/commercial-video-production/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SMMweb1.png")
The change in one breath — According to the source, cost systems aligned to how time is actually consumed—employing time-driven models, operational telemetry, and governed, versioned assumptions—replace allocations with assignments and give “believable prices, faster tenders, and margins that stop leaking through old averages.” In unstable environments, moving from monthly hindsight to daily signals turns pricing and endowment decisions into defensible arithmetic rather than negotiation theatre.
What the data says — at a glance
- Method fidelity: Activity-Based Costing ties endowment consumption to the activities that cause it, although Time-Driven ABC asks “how many minutes of calibrated capacity did this task use?”—with practical capacity (breaks, meetings, changeovers) honestly excluded, according to the source. Throughput and lean accounting focus on the bottleneck; standard costing still helps control but can hide useful variability if not updated.
- Observed grounding: The analysis draws on field interviews (operations, procurement, finance), critiques of assumption registers and variance stories, data sampling from scanner timestamps, workforce rosters, and invoice add‑ons, plus dock ride‑alongs and desk‑to‑dock reconciliations—revealing places where allocations replaced “honest assignments.”
- Telemetry gap: On a Tuas shift, “handling” comprises ten micro‑motions (e.g., unpack, inspect, reconfigure, stage, load). Sensors whisper cycle times; forklifts broadcast location; rosters record shift changes. Yet a single ledger line collapses truth into a category that cannot book improvement; the gap is not data, but names, according to the source.
Why this is shrewdly interesting — product lens — The source states “your cost system is your strategy’s operating system.” Competitors in logistics and contract manufacturing increasingly refresh pricing logic weekly as demand, fuel, and labor windows punish stale allocations. Leadership language converges on a standard: if a cost cannot be traced credibly, it should not decide the price. Credibility so if you really think about it becomes a margin lever; if cost logic “cannot survive a walk to the loading bay, it will not survive a pricing war.”
What to do next — bias to build
- Map resources to activities and time drivers with plain, operational definitions; choose methods on fit, not fashion.
- Instrument pivotal operations to capture low‑latency cost signals (scanners, sensors, location), and focus on the constraint to protect bottleneck time.
- Govern the model with documented assumptions, versioning, independent critique, and change control to keep numbers defensible.
- Shift from allocations to assignments; from averages to time equations; from monthly hindsight to daily signals—and price only what you can trace.
- Keep control where needed (standards, variance analysis) although updating standards all the time enough to avoid “comfort blanket” obsolescence.
Cost Systems After Dark: Singapore’s Waterfront, a Spreadsheet, and a Choice
A practical field report on modern cost measurement—how time, telemetry, and governance turn messy operations into decisions you can price, defend, and repeat.
30 Aug 2025
TL;DR
Align your cost system to how time is actually consumed. Use time-driven models, operational telemetry, and versioned assumptions to replace allocations with assignments. The result: believable prices, faster tenders, and margins that stop leaking through old averages.
Working definition: Cost measurement systems turn real work into comparable, auditable numbers managers can trust to guide pricing, resources, and risk.
- Activity-based and time-driven methods tie resources to drivers, not guesses.
- Standard costing helps with control but can hide useful variability.
- Throughput and lean accounting focus on bottlenecks and flow.
- Balanced scorecards connect costs to customer and process outcomes.
- Video telemetry shrinks latency and reduces allocation error.
- Governance—assumptions, versioning, independent critique—makes numbers defensible.
- Map resources to activities and time drivers with plain definitions.
- Instrument pivotal operations to capture low-latency cost signals.
- Govern the model with documented assumptions and change control.
Shift from allocations to assignments; from averages to time equations; from monthly hindsight to daily signals—and price with confidence.
At the waterline, the numbers finally ask for daylight
A finance leader stands by Singapore’s bay as freighters idle like patient chess pieces. Her phone vibrates with “non‑standard surcharge” messages. The ledger — as attributed to control; the loading cranes say contingency.
Here is the nut of the matter: costs are not a financial abstraction. They are the minutes, motions, and bottlenecks that decide tenders and trust. When the model lags the work, strategy pays for yesterday.
Our analysis relies on field interviews with operations, procurement, and finance; critiques of assumption registers and variance stories; and data sampling from scanner timestamps, workforce rosters, and invoice add‑ons. We also traced select process paths end‑to‑end—ride‑alongs on the dock, followed by desk‑to‑dock reconciliations—to see where allocations replaced honest assignments.
If your cost logic cannot survive a walk to the loading bay, it will not survive a pricing war.
Your cost system is your strategy’s operating system
Activity‑Based Costing (ABC) traces endowment consumption to the activities that cause it. It fights the bluntness of volume allocations by asking what work actually happened.
Time‑Driven Activity‑Based Costing (TDABC) goes one level closer to reality. It asks a simpler question: how many minutes of calibrated capacity did this task use? Time is a fair currency when the capacity rate is clear and practical capacity—breaks, meetings, changeovers—is honestly excluded.
Throughput and lean accounting shift attention to the constraint. If the bottleneck decides output, you measure what protects its time. In stable settings, standard costing still matters for control and variance analysis, but the “standard” must be updated often enough to be over a comfort blanket.
Choose a method like you choose a market—on fit, not fashion.
Pricing power starts with believable costs
Competitors in logistics and contract manufacturing increasingly refresh their pricing logic weekly. Not because they love complexity but because unstable demand, fuel, and labor windows punish stale allocations. Procurement leaders advocate zero‑based critiques of fee structures. Operations leaders want signal at the dock, not a variance explanation three weeks later.
Across interviews, a pattern emerged in leadership language: if a cost cannot be traced credibly, it should not decide the price. That standard, enforced calmly, turns negotiations from theater into arithmetic.
Credibility is a margin lever. Price only what you can trace.
Semantics, sensors, and the work as it is
On a Tuas shift, “handling” contains ten micro‑motions: unpack, inspect, reconfigure, stage, load, and more. Sensors already whisper cycle times. Forklifts broadcast location. Rosters record shift changes. Yet a single ledger line called “handling” collapses truth into a category that cannot book improvement.
The gap is not a lack of data. It is a lack of names. Name the motions, and the costs sort themselves into patterns you can act on. In one anonymized lane, a twilight shift — commentary speculatively tied to five minutes per container. No malice. Just a moment. Once modeled, overtime variance adjusted to a typical scale within two weeks.
Disaggregate one monolith per quarter. The savings lives in the nouns.
Methods that keep numbers honest
Method choice depends on process stability, product variety, data signal, and demand volatility. If your floor runs like jazz, do not score it like a parade. If your service queue shifts hourly, surveys will exhaust people; time equations will not.
| Method | Best for | Strength | Watch‑out |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABC | Stable processes with multiple cost drivers | High traceability to activities | Survey burden; model drift during change |
| TDABC | Fast‑changing operations and service settings | Scales with time equations; fewer surveys | Needs capacity cost rate calibration |
| Standard Costing | Control and variance management | Simple; well understood by auditors | Masks real variability; risks false comfort |
| Throughput/Lean | Bottleneck‑driven environments | Focus on flow; decisions fast | Less granular unit costing |
Fit beats elegance. Pick the method your data can feed.
Governance that lenders respect and operators can use
Assumptions needs to be visible, versioned, and ventilated. A capacity cost rate needs a date, an owner, a source for salaries and hours, and a volatility note. When a driver changes—say, average crane cycles after maintenance—your model update should read like a change log, not a wonder artifice.
A disciplined, auditable model earns trust past the boardroom. Partners, regulators, and lenders read footnotes for a living. They notice when assumptions are documented and sensitivity ranges are plausible.
Version your model like code. Every assumption deserves an author and a test.
When five minutes redefines a quarter
Late one evening, a controller reconciles scanner timestamps with labor entries. The mismatch is small but organized: a dusk change — five minutes per is thought to have remarked container. The “standard” ignored it. The line did not.
After a sleek TDABC update and revised shift planning, variance explanations shrank. Pricing corrected in the next tender cycle. The most consequential investment that quarter was a better clock and a — according to language for time.
Fix minutes to fix margins. Precision is a habit before it is a number.
From dashboards to choreography
The balanced ledger ties finance to what customers feel and operators control. Lead indicators—queue times, first‑pass give, on‑time gate moves—should predict lag indicators like unit cost and margin by lane. The aim is not a prettier dashboard. It is coherence across functions.
In interviews across logistics, manufacturing, and healthcare, leaders emphasized a shift to time‑based operational metrics that flow into pricing and capacity planning. The measure that moves a forklift should move the forecast.
Tie every cost driver to a customer‑visible metric. If they cannot feel it, reconsider measuring it.
Telemetry that turns arguments into evidence
Instrument the work generously but govern the data ruthlessly. Internet‑of‑Things (IoT) sensors, scan events, and workflow logs can replace allocations with assignments. Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES), Warehouse Management Systems (WMS), and Enterprise Endowment Planning (ERP) platforms already hold event streams. The work is to connect the streams to the cost model without drowning it.
Start small. One lane. One product family. One metric that everyone hates arguing about. Use event‑level assignments to show what changes when time is measured rather than assumed. Then scale deliberately.
Prove worth in 90 days. Expand by approach, not enthusiasm.
Eighteen months to a calmer P&L
Quarter one: calibrate time equations for your top five endowment pools; set capacity cost rates at practical capacity. Install minimal telemetry at the bottleneck and one adjacent step. Publish an assumption register.
Quarter two: rebase pricing and service‑level agreements on traceable logic. Change tenders from unit rates to time‑based offerings where possible. Begin quarterly driver critiques with sign‑offs from operations and finance.
Quarter three: embed governance—change logs, sensitivity playbooks, independent peer critique. Put model maintenance in someone’s job description. Tie incentives to data quality and on‑time updates.
Make the model a living asset. Responsibility beats heroics every week.
Jargon decoded, no mercy
- Allocation vs. Assignment
- Allocation spreads cost by a rule. Assignment ties cost to a cause. Allocation is polite. Assignment is honest.
- Capacity Cost Rate
- The cost per minute or hour of a resource at practical capacity. Excludes breaks, meetings, and expected downtime.
- Driver Drift
- When “standard” drivers no longer reflect reality—like last year’s cycle time in this year’s monsoon.
- Bottleneck Time
- The scarce minutes that control throughput. Protect them like inventory in a shortage.
- OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness)
- A composite of availability, performance, and quality. Useful, but never a substitute for time equations in pricing.
Clear terms make clear choices. Define your language before you set your price.
Asia’s tempo: volatility you can price
Risk officers in Raffles Place talk typhoons and tariffs like coaches talk weather and opponents. Route diversions, port closures, and sudden duties demand models that copy scenarios fast enough to matter. Toughness isn't alternate ports or safety stock. It is the ability to remap drivers before the storm passes.
Companies that model “what‑ifs” at the driver level act sooner. They reroute crews, reprice lanes, and renegotiate surcharges with evidence instead of anecdotes. Agility is less about hero moves and more about a model that keeps up.
Bake situation agility into the model. Rehearse the next crisis before it arrives.
Mini‑cases: where the money was hiding
| Context | Measurement fix | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Container handling at dusk | TDABC added a five‑minute twilight factor | Pricing corrected; overtime variance normalized in two weeks |
| Complex service bundle | Switched from allocation to event‑level assignment | Unprofitable SKUs re‑priced; margin uplift measured in basis points |
| Supplier surcharges | Zero‑based review using telemetry as evidence | Two fees removed; savings accrued per lane |
The truth hides in timestamps. Instrument, then insist.
Questions executives keep asking
What is the fastest way to start without boiling the ocean?
Pick one lane, product family, or service queue. Define time equations, install minimal telemetry, and agree on assumptions. Prove ROI within 90 days, then roll forward by approach.
How do we prevent model drift as operations change?
Run quarterly driver critiques. Keep an assumption register with owners and effective dates. Use a change log and light sensitivity testing to document lasting results before rollout.
Will better costing slow decisions?
At first, yes—by design. In months two and three, you gain speed with confidence. Clean numbers stop debates and shorten approvals.
Where should telemetry connect into finance?
At the driver level—cycle times, queue durations, changeovers. Feed these into capacity cost rates and time equations. Avoid raw data dumps into the general ledger.
Boardroom — remarks allegedly made by that travel well
- Masterful fit: Align your method with demand volatility and process variability.
- Telemetry: Replace allocations with assignments; guard governance as you scale sensors.
- Governance: Keep assumption registers, sensitivity ranges, and independent critique. Version everything.
- Commercialization: Re‑price with evidence; renegotiate with confidence; refresh tenders on cadence.
- Culture: Reward the discovery of cost truth—even when it contradicts story comfort.
If you cannot explain your cost logic in two minutes, do not take it to market.
Micro‑scenes: the moments when culture shifts
In a Marina Bay conference room, a junior analyst corrects a crane cycle assumption. The room pauses. The correction stands. The tender later clears. Humility wins business.
On a warehouse floor, practical capacity becomes real at the break table, the maintenance queue, the five‑minute safety huddle. Those are not rounding errors. They are the calendar of your margin.
In a budget meeting, less money is approved than requested. The team leaves encouraged because the plan is now believable. Credibility compounds faster than capital.
Culture changes when the math turns plain. Clarity lowers temperature and raises performance.
How the change actually happens
Diagnose
List the decisions that depend on cost accuracy—pricing, tendering, make‑or‑buy, service levels. Yardstick your current method against operational reality. Anywhere that allocations outnumber assignments is your heat map.
Design
Choose ABC, TDABC, standard, or throughput derived from stability and signal. Define time equations for your top endowment pools. Draft the assumption register and assign update ownership.
Deploy
Roll out in constrained range. Publish variance explanations in plain language. Tie incentives to data quality and model upkeep. Document surprises. Expand to adjacent worth streams.
Deployment is choreography. Teach the steps; then turn up the tempo.
Compliance, audits, and the luxury of sleeping well
If you cannot defend it, you do not truly know it. Regulators and auditors reward reproducibility—traceable sources, documented transformations, and sensitivity analyses that do not crumble on contact.
The same discipline calms customers and suppliers. “Audit‑ready” often equals “deal‑ready.” In the region, leadership teams now schedule cost critiques like risk committees—quietly, repeatedly, and with effect.
Proof beats vibe. Make reproducibility a habit, not a scramble.
Two short callouts for the busy reader
Yardstick against method, not myth. Treat your cost model like a product—ship, learn, iterate.
If you cannot map the minutes, you cannot price the promise.
Unbelievably practical Discoveries
- Target the top 20% of activities causing 80% of variance; correct pricing where assignment data now exists.
- Stand up an assumption register with owners, dates, and sources; critique quarterly with operations sign‑off.
- Pilot TDABC on one lane or product family; merge one telemetry stream; measure ROI in 90 days.
- Re‑price contracts with time‑based logic where possible; renegotiate surcharges employing event evidence.
- Make model maintenance part of performance goals for finance and operations leaders.
External Resources
Frameworks, methods, and benchmarks to audit your approach and speed better decisions. Each link includes approach detail or implementation guidance you can adopt.
- U.S. Government Accountability Office Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide for reliable cost estimates — Step‑by‑step practices for building, validating, and documenting estimates; includes risk, sensitivity, and independent review techniques.
- U.S. NIST Manufacturing Cost Guide with methods and calculation examples — Practical definitions, model structures, and calculation examples for industrial costing and performance evaluation.
- World Bank Logistics Performance Index 2023 methodology and cross‑country benchmarks — Survey and data methodology with comparative logistics metrics to frame operational and pricing context.
- McKinsey analysis on zero‑based budgeting reimagined for growth and discipline — Governance playbooks, ownership models, and case narratives for budget resets and cost accountability.
- Harvard Business Review Balanced Scorecard measures that drive performance overview — Foundational piece on aligning financial measures with customer, process, and learning indicators.
